{"id":13454,"date":"2019-06-12T07:51:39","date_gmt":"2019-06-12T11:51:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/phillyhistory.wpengine.com\/?p=13454"},"modified":"2019-06-24T11:09:32","modified_gmt":"2019-06-24T15:09:32","slug":"naming-bridges-in-the-1950s-benjamin-franklin-and-walt-whitman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/2019\/06\/naming-bridges-in-the-1950s-benjamin-franklin-and-walt-whitman\/","title":{"rendered":"Naming Bridges in the 1950s: Benjamin Franklin and Walt Whitman"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The vision to span the Delaware River goes back as far as 1818, but the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.phillyhistory.org\/PhotoArchive\/Detail.aspx?assetId=5792\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Delaware River Bridge<\/a>\u00a0wasn&#8217;t completed for another 108 years. This project coincided with the Sesquicentennial Exposition, Philadelphia&#8217;s celebration of the 150th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.\u00a0 Here we tell the story of the bridges renaming and the controversy about the name of a second span in the 1950s.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_13458\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-13458\" style=\"width: 476px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.phillyhistory.org\/PhotoArchive\/Detail.aspx?assetId=34829\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-13458\" src=\"https:\/\/phillyhistory.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Walt-Whitman-Bridge-Towers-43492-34829.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"476\" height=\"662\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Walt-Whitman-Bridge-Towers-43492-34829.jpg 600w, https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Walt-Whitman-Bridge-Towers-43492-34829-216x300.jpg 216w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 476px) 100vw, 476px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-13458\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Walt Whitman Bridge Towers East &#8211; September 23, 1955 (PhillyHistory.org)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong>1951 &#8211;<\/strong>\u00a0The Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA) proposed a new bridge three miles downstream from the 25-year old span connecting Center City Philadelphia and Camden &#8211; the Delaware River Bridge.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1953 <\/strong>&#8211; Construction begins on the second suspension bridge to span the Delaware, this one connecting South Philadelphia and Gloucester City, New Jersey. DRPA dubs it \u201cthe new bridge\u201d or\u00a0\u201cBridge No.2.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>April 1954<\/strong> \u2013 &#8220;The Bridge Without a Name,&#8221; a prominent story in the <em>Inquirer<\/em>, inspires a rash of proposed names for both the earlier Delaware River Bridge and the new one. (Ike and Mamie?) Other suggestions include Gloucester City Bridge, Packer Avenue Bridge, and Philester, a combination of the two. Some prefer the more regional Penjerdel. Familiar names tossed around include William Penn, Thomas Jefferson, John Barry, Thomas Paine, Betsy Ross, James Buchanan, Woodrow\u00a0Wilson,\u00a0Franklin Delano Roosevelt, John Wanamaker, Thomas Edison, among others. Someone suggested &#8220;Brotherhood Bridge.&#8221; The Pennsylvania chapter of American Gold Star Mothers wanted the bridge to be called &#8220;Penn-Jersey Memorial Bridge&#8221; in\u00a0honor of the casualties of World War II and Korea.<\/p>\n<p><strong>May 1954<\/strong> \u2013 Mindful of the upcoming 250<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary of Benjamin Franklin\u2019s birth in 1956, an executive at the Franklin Institute urges that one bridge be named for Franklin. The idea gains traction.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1954 &amp; 1955 &#8211;<\/strong>\u00a0The DRPA appoints a Special Committee on Bridge Names which unanimously approves the renaming of the earlier bridge as the &#8220;Benjamin Franklin Bridge.&#8221; Bridge No.2 will become the &#8220;Walt Whitman Bridge.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>August &amp; September 1955<\/strong> &#8211; Gloucester City Council protests naming the new bridge for Whitman, pointing out that the DRPA didn\u2019t consult them, observing that &#8220;Whitman had nothing to do with Gloucester.&#8221; They allocate funds for signs\u00a0with their preferred name: the &#8220;Gloucester Bridge.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>November &amp; December 1955<\/strong> &#8211; <em>The Catholic Star Herald,<\/em> the newspaper of the Camden diocese, publishes three articles by Reverend James Ryan of St. Anne&#8217;s Church in Westville, New Jersey.\u00a0\u201cAs a poet,&#8221; wrote Father Ryan, Whitman &#8220;is recognized even by his most favorable critics as definitely \u2018second-rate.\u2019 . . . As a thinker Walt Whitman possesses the depth of a saucer and enjoys a vision which extends about as far as his eyelids. A naturalist, a pantheist, a freethinker, a man whose ideas were destructive of usual ethical codes-is this a name we wish to preserve for posterity? . . . The philosophy\u00a0of Walt Whitman crumbles under the destructive egotism that gave\u00a0it life. . . . We\u00a0don\u2019t want our new span named after a man whose ideas\u00a0fell\u00a0far\u00a0short of spanning the\u00a0problems of human existence.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the last of his articles, Father Ryan reveals his main objection: \u201cWhitman&#8217;s major works exhibit a revolting homosexual imagery that is not confined to a few isolated passages but permeates the fetid whole.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><em>What happened next? <a href=\"https:\/\/phillyhistory.wpengine.com\/index.php\/2019\/06\/the-objectionable-walt-whitman-gets-his-bridge\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Click here<\/a>\u00a0and <a href=\"https:\/\/phillyhistory.wpengine.com\/index.php\/2019\/06\/a-walt-whitman-bridge-the-good-gray-poet-wouldnt-want-it\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a> to find out.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The vision to span the Delaware River goes back as far as 1818, but the Delaware River Bridge\u00a0wasn&#8217;t completed for another 108 years. This project coincided with the Sesquicentennial Exposition, Philadelphia&#8217;s celebration of the 150th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.\u00a0 Here we tell the story of the bridges renaming and the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13454"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13454\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}