{"id":11777,"date":"2017-10-09T08:05:51","date_gmt":"2017-10-09T12:05:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/phillyhistory.wpengine.com\/?p=11777"},"modified":"2017-10-09T08:05:51","modified_gmt":"2017-10-09T12:05:51","slug":"the-only-large-building-in-the-world-entirely-devoted-to-telephone-purposes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/2017\/10\/the-only-large-building-in-the-world-entirely-devoted-to-telephone-purposes\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;The only large building in the world entirely devoted to telephone purposes&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_11778\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-11778\" style=\"width: 325px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.phillyhistory.org\/PhotoArchive\/Detail.aspx?assetId=80807\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-11778\" src=\"https:\/\/phillyhistory.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Telephone-bldg-Market-st-12380-29.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"325\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Telephone-bldg-Market-st-12380-29.jpg 600w, https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Telephone-bldg-Market-st-12380-29-195x300.jpg 195w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 325px) 100vw, 325px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-11778\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Bell Telephone Building, 406-408 Market Street, 1972 (PhillyHistory.org)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><figure id=\"attachment_11793\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-11793\" style=\"width: 325px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.phillyhistory.org\/PhotoArchive\/Detail.aspx?assetId=80805\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-11793\" src=\"https:\/\/phillyhistory.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Telephone-Bldg-Mkt-st-detail-80805-12380-27.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"325\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Telephone-Bldg-Mkt-st-detail-80805-12380-27.jpg 600w, https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Telephone-Bldg-Mkt-st-detail-80805-12380-27-270x300.jpg 270w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 325px) 100vw, 325px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-11793\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Third and fourth floor of the Bell Telephone Building, 406-408 Market Street [1972] (PhillyHistory.org)<\/figcaption><\/figure>How did the thousands of Philadelphians wired for telephone service connect with one another? How would they talk with early adopters in other cities? Connectivity for the ever increasing numbers of subscribers was the ongoing challenge. As told recently in <a href=\"https:\/\/phillyhistory.wpengine.com\/index.php\/2017\/09\/to-be-or-not-to-be-that-was-no-longer-the-question\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a post illustrated with the horse-drawn telephone parade float<\/a>, Philadelphia\u2019s telephone industry served less than 5,000 in 1895 but would balloon to more than 100,000 a dozen years later.<\/p>\n<p>The American telephone industry needed investment and innovation. In 1901, the world\u2019s total mileage of phone wire stood near five million. Just over a decade later the total stood at more than 29 million miles\u2014half of the world\u2019s total. Americans had poured more than one billion dollars into infrastructure, and it was paying off. By 1912, there were nearly 12.5 million telephones in the world; 67% were in American homes and businesses.<\/p>\n<p>But none were useful without innovations that would enhance connectivity. That&#8217;s where Bell Telephone\u2019s building 406-408 Market came in. After alterations by architect Addison Hutton in 1891, this purpose-built, four-story structure would accept 250 underground cables from the surrounding streets. \u201cBelieved to be the only large building in the world entirely devoted to telephone purposes,\u201d 406-408 Market was expected \u201cto meet every requirement of the present, and all the possibilities of the future.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>On the top, sun-lit fourth floor Bell installed a new Law switchboard, \u201cthe most wonderful of all of the many wonderful appliances for securing prompt and efficient service.\u201d This 80-foot long \u201cLaw board\u201d contained 2,500 mile of wire configured for 10,000 circuits allowing as many as 90 operators \u201cto make any desired connection instantly.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>John F. Casey, an inventor from St. Louis, had patented this telephone system in December 1888. \u201cThe methods now in vogue,\u201d read Casey\u2019s discussion of his improvement, resulted in \u201cgreat delay and embarrassment\u201d when subscribers from different central offices want to speak with one another. A subscriber would call their central office and that office would connect with the second central office. Once connected, operators at both central offices would have to call and then reconnect the two subscribers before making the connection between them. Such bottlenecks wasted \u201ca great deal of time\u201d and were \u201cvery unsatisfactory.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Casey\u2019s invention required that central offices had permanent, open circuits with one another so that &#8220;both operators that make the connections in each office hear the call at the same time. This obviates the necessity of central office A first making connection with central office B, then calling up central office B and waiting until said central office B makes the connection.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_11779\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-11779\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-11779\" src=\"https:\/\/phillyhistory.wpengine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Law-Switchboard-in-St-Louis.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"333\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Law-Switchboard-in-St-Louis.jpg 600w, https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Law-Switchboard-in-St-Louis-300x167.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-11779\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A Law Switchboard, ca. 1888 in Saint Louis Missouri. (Wikimedia.org)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>\u201cBy my invention.\u201d claimed Casey, conversations can take place \u201cbetween subscribers connected with different central offices as expeditiously as between subscribers belonging to the same central office.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But the success of America&#8217;s telephone industry\u2019s would literally be in the hands of an army of efficient operators.<\/p>\n<p>Want ads called for young women \u201cof unquestionable character [with] 12th grade public school education\u201d to apply in person. Fresh hires would \u201clearn long distance telephone operating\u201d at the Market Street facility while being paid. Graduates would be placed in telephone offices \u201cconvenient to home.\u201d In 1912, the Bell Telephone bragged of its \u201cenlarged operators\u2019 school, second to none in the country in completeness\u2026 receiving more than 1100 students a year.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With investment, invention, technology and training, American telephony had found its stride. But that didn\u2019t stop company executives from looking for additional ways of to improve service, and the company\u2019s bottom line.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCourtesy Too Costly\u201d read a <em>New York Times<\/em> headline in 1907, The Keystone Telephone Company\u2019s top traffic manager in Philadelphia, A. J. Ulrich, insisted on dropping the word \u201cplease.\u201d Ulrich had studied the situation and \u201cfound that patrons making calls and operators answering them\u201d uttered the word \u201cplease\u201d 900,000 times every day. He calculated that Keystone\u2019s 450 \u201cgirl operators\u201d and the subscribers they served wasted 7,500 minutes, or 125 hours, each and every day.<\/p>\n<p>The Keystone Company banned use of the word \u201cplease.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Not long after, AT&amp;T attempted to dissuade its employees and customers from using the word \u201cHello.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>We know how <em>that<\/em>\u00a0initiative on behalf of hyper-efficiency worked out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #808080\">[Sources: John F. Casey, A New Telephone System, <em>U.S. Patent<\/em> #394, 832, December 18, 1888. (<a href=\"https:\/\/patentimages.storage.googleapis.com\/da\/5a\/1a\/58087d75d50dbc\/US394832.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PDF<\/a>); <em><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/philadelphiapo00phil\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Philadelphia and Popular Philadelphians<\/a><\/em>, (Philadelphia, The North American, 1891); Want Ads, <em>The Philadelphia Inquirer<\/em>, October 8, 1905; \u201cCourtesy Too Costly,\u201d <em>The New York Times<\/em>, September 6, 1907; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/telephonestatist00amer\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Telephone Statistics of the World<\/a>\u00a0(American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 1912);\u00a0 \u201cA Year in the Bell Telephone Plant Department\u201d (Advertisement) <em>The Philadelphia Inquirer<\/em>, October 18, 1912.]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>How did the thousands of Philadelphians wired for telephone service connect with one another? How would they talk with early adopters in other cities? Connectivity for the ever increasing numbers of subscribers was the ongoing challenge. As told recently in a post illustrated with the horse-drawn telephone parade float, Philadelphia\u2019s telephone industry served less than [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11777","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11777"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11777\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.phillyhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}